2.2 KiB
| title | date | draft | tags | summary | mastodon_url | bluesky_url | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Of Mutuals and Firehoses | 2025-06-19 | false |
|
If you look at my Mastodon profile then you might notice I follow _a ton_ of people. (On BlueSky it's similar but a little lower than I'd like.) How do I manage them, and who do I look for when following? | https://mastodon.art/@redstrate/114712733703343490 | https://bsky.app/profile/redstrate.com/post/3lrypztij6c22 |
If you look at my Mastodon profile then you might notice I follow a ton of people. (On BlueSky it's similar but a little lower than I'd like.) How do I manage them, and who do I look for when following?
The most obvious contenders are people who have similar interests to me: they make cool art, play games I enjoy, do reverse engineering, or is a general cool person. My other reason is one I don't see that often, is if they're actually active on the platform. I think the easiest way to gauge this is to see how many people they're following:
In this case, I would be initially hesitant to follow this person. I'm going to call them "firehoses" - they just post stuff and immediately hide, with little interaction. This is fine and I don't want to shame anything who is doing that - I'm sure you have reasons... but I don't like it these days1. There's plenty of other people to follow out there, and social media is an exchange after all! If I do end up following this person, they're usually the first to get cut when I find my timeline is getting too busy.
In general I try to maintain a ~1/2 ratio of followers/following (I'll see if that actually scales.) I find that makes my timeline the best-kind-of-busy when reading it after a long day of work or in bed. My long-term goal is to replace the firehoses I follow with mutuals instead, which I think makes social media way more comfy ❤️
-
I mean on social media specifically. On something like RSS, I don't find this a problem at all due to the nature of the format (but it's cool to see interactions from the author in a comments section still!) ↩︎